Embryonic Stem Cell Research Essay

Dear Mr. Doerflinger1,In response to your article on embryotic Stem Cell Research, I would like to point out that mans war against disease, has latterly bring upd dramatically by means of the introduction of such techniques as pre-implantation inherited diagnosis (PGD), and has been instrumental in two saving lives and preventing disease. This approach, which has already been apply to fight such disorders as Huntingtons disease, cystic fibrosis, and more new-fang conductly, cancer, opens the delegacy for undreamt of possibilities concerning twain the proximo diagnoses of different diseases, and their subsequent treatments ( transmissible Engineering, 2007).Throughout the world, thousands of children atomic number 18 born with disembodied spirit-threatening diseases and conditions, which man, through contagious science, is now potentially correct of either treating, or maybe even entirely eliminating. By allowing genetic scientists the necessary freedom to continue with seek, and to intention the recent advancements that science has acheived in embryo screening, future generations will be able to live womb-to-tomb and healthier lives (Bi unityt, 2007).Within your statement you claim that More than two decades of research using mouse embryonic stem cells contrive produced no treatments . that atomic number 18 safe or effective enough for any unrivaled to propose in humans. These cells corroborate not helped a single human being (Richard M. Doerflinger, 2007). However, in recent years genetic science has already saved, and changed, the lives of many, giving hope to families approach desperate situations. Adam Nashs bear, in August 2000, is just one example, which so clearly demonstrates the beginning of a whole new back that is just beginning to open before man.Adams embryo was chosen after having been screened for Fanconi anemia (FA), which is a r ar, and often fatal, congenital seam disorder, due to the fact that Adams parents were bot h carriers of the disease. They already had one child, Molly, who had been born with the rare blood disorder, and the Nashs wanted a sib for their little girl but one who was not inflicted with the same disorder. However, doctors, through the use of PGD, were able to find an embryo with tissue that matched Mollys, which led to their daughter being cured.For the first time in medical memoir doctors blended the sciences of in vitro fertilisation, stem cells, and genetic screening (5280.com, 2005). One-day-old embryos were tested for FAs genetic code, and healthy ones were further screened for a tissue match. The embryo was so transplanted into Lisa Nashs womb and immediately after Adams birth blood was removed from the umbilical cord. This was then used for the critical, life-saving transplant.Today both Molly and Adam Nash are healthy, normal children that can, along with their parents, look forrard with confidence (ScienCentralNews, 2004).Clearly research is needed to determine whether the use of embryos is murder, and restrictions apply to ensure that asthetic choices, such as gender and appearence, are not permitted. precisely medical sicence isnt interested in obtaining perfect babies, its objective is solidification and preventing disease.Therefore, scientific research in this field to should be continued to advance the human race, especially if he is to make any headway in understanding the nature of disease, its origins and its cure. And, although there is a need to address both the ethical and social questions that have been raised by those who fear the posibility of architect babies, medical science must be allowed to progress, if we are ever to successfully combat diseases and conditions that both wreck lives, and kill human beings (Caroline Mackie Ogilvie, 2007).The likely possibilities are immense but genes offering protection against fatal and crippling diseases are not the only benefits of this incredible medical advancement. There are b esides genes that enhance intelligence, the five senses, beauty, and almost every other aspect of man, which opens up other avenues of exploration. Many animals, for example, possess skills and senses that humans dont have such as better hearing, or leg regeneration. In the future it may be possible, through gene identification, to incorporate these functions into humans (GMO, 2007), and use them to heal conditions such as deafness, or in limb replacement.It is clear that ethical and social questions concerning the future use of genetic engineering at bottom modern society will need to be addressed. While take into account democratic laws and structures will hopefully reflect a considered and balance insure of the importance of genetic medicine for future generations, such measures should not be allowed to interfere with future scientific research.References5280.com, Online Article, The Miracle of Molly, 2005. Information retrieved 03/27/2007.Bionet Explore life science and deba te the issues, Online Article, Design-a-Baby? 2007. rogue Downloaded 03/12/2007. Caroline Mackie Ogilvie, et al., Online Article, Preimplantation Genetic diagnosingAnOverview, 2007. scalawag downloaded 03/19/2007. www.jhc.org/cgi/content/full/53/3/255Genetic Engineering, Joo Pedro de Magalhes, Online Article, Defining Our Childrens Traits, 2007. GMO Genetic Engineering, Online Article, Designer Baby Ethics, 2007. Page downloaded 03/19/2007.Richard M. Doerflinger, The Ethics & Religious Liberty Comission, Online Article,Testimony of Richard M. Doerflinger on Embryonic Stem Cell Research, 2004.Page downloaded 03/19/2007.ScienCentralNews, Online Article, Stem Cell Siblings, 2004. Page downloaded 03/19/2007.1 Audience Richard M. Doerflinger is Deputy Director of the Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities, unite States Conference of Catholic Bishops, where he has worked for 25 years. Among his duties is the preparation of policy statements and congressional testimony on abortion, euthanas ia, embryo research, human cloning, and other medical-moral issues for the bishops conference.