Comparison of the Ethical Theories of Kant, Bentham and Mill

This paper intends to look into the theory of ethics of Immanuel Kant, Jeremy Bentham, conjuration Stuart Mill and analyse them from one an some other(a). In addition to that, it also aims to mention the uncertainty which grant arisen as I tackled these theories.Immanuel Kants speculation of Ethics FormalismAccording to Immanuel Kants Theory of Ethics, a deed is compensate if the acts involved in the progression atomic number 18 also right (Thomson Gale, 2008, n.p.). Simply put, the end is notwithstanding just if the way are as well (Thomson Gale, 2008, n.p.).Jeremy Benthams Theory of Ethics good UniversalismAccording to Jeremy Bentham, his theory of ethics otherwise know as ethical or moral universalism is instituted upon utility which he categorically defines as that property in any object, whereby it ends to produce upbeat, advantage, pleasure, good, or contentment or to prevent the misfortune of mischief, pain, evil, or un happiness to the party whose interest is con sidered (Bentham, 1948, p. 126). In turn, the aforesaid construct of universalism is established by looking into the following hypotheses/assertions/principles1)Jeremy Bentham asserts that the following terminologies a) pleasure b) happiness c) goodness d) benefit e) advantage 5) etcetera are of the same survey so to speak (Germino, 1972, pp. 235 236)2)Jeremy Bentham reiterates that the following terminologies a) pleasure b) happiness c) goodness d) benefit e) advantage 5) etcetera are actually gauged, thus, calculable and irrefutable as well (Germino, 1972, pp. 235 236)3)Jeremy Bentham argues that an individuals act, as well as, the actions of the government ought to be founded or rooted upon the imperative which actually takes complete advantage of gladness and dwindles pain (Germino, 1972, pp. 235 236) and that4)Finally, it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong of human action in every situation, and in grouchy when governme ntal action is called for (Germino, 1972, pp. 235 236).John Stuart Mills Theory of Ethics UtilitarianismUtilitarianism, gibe to John Stuart Mill, is where morals/ethics/good deeds are base/founded/instituted upon (Ebenstein & Ebenstein, 1991, p. 580). The reason behind this claim is that, deeds are only correct or proper if and only if the at the end of it happiness is achieved/felt and wrong or improper if and only if at the blockage stage of the deed wretchedness is reached (Ebenstein & Ebenstein, 1991, p. 580).That being said, happiness for John Stuart Mill is equivalent to the absence of unhappiness or any harming of negative emotion (Germino, 1972, p. 240). While, wretchedness for him, is when the occurrence of pain/ache/ agony is present at the finish of a certain deed (Germino 1972, p. 240).ComparisonImmanuel Kants theory of ethics is known as formalism, while that of Jeremy Benthams is known as ethical universalism, and that of John Stuart Mill is that of Utilitar ianism which differ from each other a littler since Kant reiterates that an act is good only if the process utilise to reach that is ethical as well while Bentham is based on the number of people going to benefit happiness from on the other hand, Mill states that an act is right if one ends up being riant (Germino, 1972, p. 240).Confusion/Uncertainty which have ArisenThere is a certain concept that is a little confusing, for instance, why is it that the number of population achieving happiness is important to Bentham when it should be replete that an individual becomes happy due to an ethical act being carried push through (Germino, 1972, p. 240)? It gets confusing because instead of focusing on the quality of happiness, the ethical theories were focused on the quantity (Germino, 1972, p. 240).ReferencesEbenstein, W. and Ebenstein, A. (1991). Great Political Thinkers Plato to the President.Forth Worth Harcourt BraceGermino, D. (1972). Machiavelli to Marx Modern occidental Pol itical Thought. ChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press