'Advantages and Hazards of Embedding Media Elements\r'

'Advantages and Hazards of Embedding Media Elements with antecedent Deploying Units conscientious objector Springs, Colorado September, 2012 Abstract War has evolved, as has the media and society’s demand for its updates. us able-bodied shelter continues to remain a cash in ones chips charge precedentity however; we must(prenominal)(prenominal)iness(prenominal)(prenominal) non ignore the first amendment rights of the press. Our judicature exists for its people, and when we mobilize our soldiers assets it is on the behalf of the people we request to moderate they are informed.Thus, we must analyze and balance the haps and advantages of the media’s date with on expiry forces operations. Commanders Brief: Advantages and Hazards of Embedding Media Elements with Forward Deploying Units As we prepare for an impending phalanx machine mobilization, we must decide the level to which the media tot bothyow be embedded and suck in glide path to military updates. Members of the media desire to be able to send near real era reports and updates as the battle unfolds. Concurrently, unit commanding officers indigence to insure that operational security (OPSEC) is not compromised as a result.Advantages of Media Inclusion The advance(a) American is a creature parasitical on immediate gratification in everything they do. Receiving news updates on operations that their military is conducting is no different. Several popular vox populi polls suggest that, by and large, the everyday was thoroughly satisfied with wartime coverage during the sign invasion of Iraq for Operation Iraqi emancipation (Kim, 2004). This was thanks to, in part, by the rare opening granted to reporters on the line of business, as well as advances in dialogue technologies.It was particularly helpful from the perspective of the unite States Government (USG) as it helped ensure that the data relayed to the public was credible rather than propaganda from the enemy. Additionally, as the USG maintains a civilian controlled military, more foil can garner more backing and less suspicion from the populace. much(prenominal) and situation from the homeland during operations such as the Iraq invasion can assure battlefield decisions are being made by field commanders rather than politics. Potential Hazards of Media InclusionIncreased media access has indeed helped insure the true spirit level is being told. However there have been instances when the embedded reporters transmitted inaccurate study (PBS, 2003). Such information could be as minor as a smooth miscalculation of enemy tanks destroyed in a battle, or as major as declaring a friendly invoke casualty rather than enemy fire. both way, it is imperative that we ensure the utmost accuracy with all reports being made. Another hazard is the reallocation of forces to ensure the guard of the reporters themselves as they are not combatants.This can ordinarily be quelled by ensuring an equal safe distance from the frontline is adhered to. However, in the government issue that US forces find themselves outnumbered, or in a disadvantageous position, US staff office must then not exactly repel the enemy, but take spear carrier measure to ensure the safety of the reporters. Such an instance could result in additive loss of life, equipment, or bursting charge initiative. thus there is perhaps the greatest electric potential hazard of all: OPSEC. OPSEC is paramount for military success. It ensures the enemy doesn’t know our intentions, methods, or capabilities.If the media is too loosely monitored, they could potentially step down critical information. If mission details are made available to the enemy prior to or even during an operation, operational security has been compromised, and the mission may be jeopardized (Kim, 2004). making a Compromise, Finding a equilibrate Ultimately, military operations are going to occur and the media will need to b e present. In order to maintain mission integrity a balance must be found and compromises will need to be made. First, let’s plow ensuring accurate reporting is taking place.As all major military commands have public affairs officers and uniformed soldiers tasked with reporting themselves, it should be relatively painless to ensure all civilian reports are monitored for accuracy forrader being transmitted. This can also ensure OPSEC guidelines are being adhered to as well. We must also make it very recognize that there may be propagation when military operations will rent the media to not be allowed to transmit for undetermined amounts of time. As for maintaining the physical security and safety of civilian media personnel, we should restrict their postings to larger units, mob or great.Doing this will provide greater numbers of forces for security of the reporters without degrading combat effectiveness. Additionally, during times of intense combat, every suit should be made by the onsite commander to make sure the civilians are well clear of front lines. Conclusion As war and the military continue to evolve, so must the USG’s relationship with the media. The media must no longer be viewed as merely a burden and an discarded distraction, but as another putz for the commander. Our military force is highly educate and professional.Having accurate and timely media coverage of military operations will ensure that the humans sees it. References Kim, J. J. (2004). Reporters on the Battlefield: The embed call down System in Historical Context. In Rand: National Security Division. Retrieved September 6, 2012, from http://www. rand. org/pubs/monographs/2004/RAND_MG200. pdf Pros and Cons of Embedded Journalism. (2003, March 27). In PBS intelligence service Hour. Retrieved September 6, 2012, from http://www. pbs. org/newshour/extra/features/jan-june03/embed_3-27. html\r\n'